Tag: deep work

  • Why your packed calendar is actually a massive red flag for your career

    Why your packed calendar is actually a massive red flag for your career

    If you show me a calendar that looks like a game of Tetris played by a color-blind person, I don’t see a high performer. I see a catastrophe. I see someone who has lost control of their time and, more importantly, their ability to produce anything of actual value.

    Being “busy” is the ultimate hiding spot. It’s the easiest way to feel like you’re winning while you’re actually just spinning your wheels in the mud. We’ve turned responsiveness into a personality trait, and it’s killing our careers. If you’re answering every Slack message in thirty seconds, you aren’t a team player; you’re a distraction-addict who can’t handle the silence of real thought.

    The Tuesday I realized I was a fraud

    Back in 2018, I was working as a project coordinator for a small logistics firm in Chicago. My desk was a mess of Post-it notes, I had three monitors going, and I felt like a god. I was the person everyone came to. I was “in the loop.” I remember sitting in my car at 6:00 PM on a rainy Tuesday, staring at the steering wheel, and realizing I couldn’t name a single thing I had actually built or solved that day. I had sent 142 emails. I had attended four meetings that could have been a single bullet point. I had managed to be busy for ten hours without doing a single minute of real work.

    It was embarrassing. I felt like a hollow shell of a professional. I was essentially a human router, just moving information from one place to another without adding any value. Busyness is like a weighted blanket for a mediocre career; it makes you feel safe while you’re doing nothing.

    Anyway, I quit that job six months later because I couldn’t stand the person I was becoming. But I digress. The point is, shallow work—those low-value, logistical tasks that keep you busy but don’t move the needle—is a trap we set for ourselves because deep work is actually hard and lonely.

    Why I think the “4-hour rule” is total nonsense

    Flat lay image of a calendar with a purple ribbon and the text 'Keep Calm and Check Your Balls' for testicular cancer awareness.

    I know people will disagree with me here, and Cal Newport is obviously a genius, but I think the idea that most people can do four hours of deep work a day is a flat-out lie. I’ve tried. I’ve tracked it using a physical stopwatch on my desk for three months straight. My average “actual” deep work time? 52 minutes. On a great day? Maybe 90 minutes.

    What I mean is—actually, let me put it differently. We lie to ourselves about how much we can actually focus. Most people who claim they do four hours of deep work are actually just doing two hours of work and two hours of “thinking about work” while staring at a Google Doc. Real deep work—the kind that makes your brain feel hot and tired—is exhausting. If you can do one solid hour of it, you’ve already won the day. Most people do zero.

    Shallow work is what keeps you employed. Deep work is what gets you promoted.

    The Slack-shaped hole in your productivity

    I’m going to say something that would probably get me fired from a lot of tech companies: I think Slack is a net negative for the human race. I specifically hate the “Huddle” feature. It is the digital equivalent of someone poking you in the ribs while you’re trying to read.

    I refuse to use Notion for the same reason. People spend more time making their Notion pages look pretty with icons and headers than they do actually working. It’s glorified scrapbooking for adults who are afraid of a blank white page. I know everyone loves it, but I find it bloated and performative. There, I said it. Give me a plain text file any day.

    A Slack notification is a digital pebble thrown at your window. If you let people throw pebbles at your window all day, you’ll never get any sleep. And you’ll certainly never write anything worth reading or code anything worth shipping.

    Total cowardice.

    The actual math of a focused hour

    I ran a little experiment last year. I tracked my “Time to First Distraction” (TFD) for 14 work days. I used a simple spreadsheet to log every time I checked my phone or opened a tab that wasn’t related to the task at hand.

    • Average TFD: 11 minutes.
    • Longest streak: 34 minutes (I had to turn my router off to achieve this).
    • Shortest streak: 2 minutes (someone sent a meme of a cat).

    When you look at the data, it’s horrifying. If you’re switching tasks every 11 minutes, you are never actually entering a flow state. You’re just living in the shallows. You’re basically a professional goldfish. We think we’re multitasking, but we’re really just suffering from continuous partial attention. It’s a career-killer because it prevents you from ever becoming truly “rare and valuable,” which is the only real job security that exists anymore.

    I’ve bought the same $120 mechanical keyboard four times because the tactile click helps me stay in the zone. I don’t care if something better exists; that specific sound is the only thing that keeps me from clicking over to Twitter when a sentence gets hard to write.

    Stop being so accessible

    The most successful people I know are actually quite annoying to work with. They don’t answer emails quickly. They decline meetings without a “valid” excuse. They are often “offline” during the middle of the day. At first, I thought they were just arrogant. Now I realize they’re just protective.

    If you are accessible to everyone, you are useful to no one. You become a commodity. And commodities are easily replaced. If your job is just to be a fast responder, a script can do your job better than you can. You have to carve out space where you are unreachable.

    I still struggle with this every single day. Yesterday, I spent forty-five minutes looking for a specific font for a project that nobody is even going to see until next month. I was being “busy” because the actual task—writing a difficult proposal—felt too heavy. I’m not perfect at this. I’m just tired of pretending that being overwhelmed is a badge of honor.

    Do you actually have too much work, or are you just afraid of what happens when you turn off the noise and have to actually think?

    Stop checking your email. Close the tab.

  • Why chasing Inbox Zero is the fastest way to stay mediocre at work

    Why chasing Inbox Zero is the fastest way to stay mediocre at work

    It was 2:14 PM on a Tuesday in October—October 12th, 2021, to be exact. I remember because I was sitting in my home office, staring at a little gold medal emoji on my screen. I had done it. I hit ‘Inbox Zero’ in Superhuman. Every single thread was archived, snoozed, or deleted. I felt like a productivity god. I felt clean. Then, about ten minutes later, I realized I hadn’t actually done anything for my actual job in four hours. I was supposed to be finishing a strategy deck for our Q4 planning, but instead, I was a world-class sorter of digital mail. I was a highly-paid mail clerk. It was pathetic.

    We’ve been sold this idea that an empty inbox equals a clear mind. It’s a lie. What I mean is—actually, let me put it differently: an empty inbox is usually just proof that you spent your most valuable hours reacting to other people’s agendas instead of building your own. If your inbox is at zero, your most important projects are probably at a standstill.

    The day I realized I was a professional email-answerer

    I used to be obsessed with the tools. I paid $30 a month for Superhuman because I thought the keyboard shortcuts would make me faster. And they did! I could archive a newsletter about AI trends in 0.4 seconds. I could reply “Thanks, will look later” to my boss with a flick of my wrist. But the faster I got, the more emails I received. It’s a feedback loop from hell. You reply fast, people reply back faster. You’re essentially training your colleagues to treat you like an Instant Messenger service rather than a human being who needs time to think.

    I might be wrong about this, but I think the entire “productivity” industry is just a way for us to feel busy without being productive. We love the dopamine hit of the Archive button. It feels like a win. But deep work—the kind of work that actually moves the needle, the kind where you lose track of time and solve a hard problem—doesn’t happen in an inbox. It happens when you ignore the world for three hours. You can’t do that if you’re checking your mail every twelve minutes to make sure that little number stays at zero.

    The $30/month lie

    A relaxing lounge corner in Shanghai featuring snacks, a smartphone, and decorative plants.

    I’ve come to absolutely loathe Superhuman. I know people love it, and they swear by the “speed,” but I think it’s a predatory product. It gamifies the very thing that keeps us from doing our best work. It makes you feel like an elite athlete for doing the most basic, shallow task imaginable: reading text. I cancelled my subscription six months ago and went back to the basic, ugly Gmail interface. It’s slower. It’s clunky. And that’s exactly why I love it. It makes me want to spend less time there. Total waste of money.

    The more efficient you are at email, the more email you will be forced to do.

    My 22-day experiment with being “unresponsive”

    Last November, I decided to track my output. I spent 22 work days tracking exactly how much time I spent in “processing mode” vs. “creation mode.” I used a simple stopwatch on my desk. On days where I prioritized Inbox Zero, I averaged 147 minutes of email time and produced, on average, 1.5 pages of actual documentation or code. On days where I let the inbox rot—I’m talking 50+ unread messages by EOD—I averaged 32 minutes of email and 6 pages of output. The math isn’t even close. My brain was 4x more productive when I was being a “bad” communicator.

    Here is my unfair take that I know will annoy people: If you reply to every email within five minutes, I don’t trust you with big projects. It tells me you don’t have anything more important to do. It tells me your focus is fragile. I’ve started intentionally waiting 4-24 hours to reply to non-urgent stuff just to prove to myself (and them) that I’m busy doing the work they actually hired me for. It’s uncomfortable. People get annoyed. But the work is better.

    The part that actually works

    • Check email twice a day. 11 AM and 4 PM. That’s it.
    • Turn off every single notification. If it’s a real emergency, they’ll call you. (They never call).
    • Accept the mess. An unread inbox is a sign of a busy life.
    • Stop using “productivity” apps that make email feel like a video game.

    I used to think I was being disciplined by keeping my inbox clean. I was completely wrong. I was just scared of the hard work. It’s much easier to clear 50 emails than it is to stare at a blank Google Doc and figure out a product strategy. Inbox Zero is a form of procrastination that looks like work. It’s the ultimate hiding spot for people who are afraid to be great.

    Anyway, I digress. The point is that your inbox is a conveyor belt of other people’s priorities, and if you spend all day standing at that belt, you’ll never build anything of your own. I still struggle with it. Sometimes I see that notification bubble and my thumb twitches. It’s an addiction.

    I don’t know if I’ll ever be fully “cured” of the need to organize my digital life. But I do know that my best work—the stuff I’m actually proud of—happened when my inbox was a complete disaster.

    Stop cleaning the house and go build something.